1. Quick Summary: How One Skull Redefined Human History
A major piece of the human evolution puzzle has been drastically changed by a careful, modern study of a 1-million-year-old skull known as Yunxian 2, found in China.1 The fossil was heavily crushed, but by using advanced digital tools to fix the damage, scientists have completely changed where it sits on our family tree.
1.1. Key Discovery: A New Relative
The skull was originally labeled as Homo erectus (an older type of human) based mostly on its age. But the reconstructed skull shows a surprising mix of older and newer features. Now, detailed analysis places it as an original, early member of the Asian human group called Homo longi, or 'Dragon Man'.2 This
H. longi group is now believed to include the Denisovans, a mysterious ancient human type only known previously from their DNA.3
1.2. The Timeline Just Got Much Older
This new placement means the H. longi group is the closest relative (sister group) to our own group, Homo sapiens (modern humans). By checking the family tree structure, researchers calculate that the split between the H. sapiens line and the H. longi line happened about 1.32 million years ago (Mya).4 This time frame is huge—it pushes back the estimated start of the modern human line by about 400,000 to 500,000 years compared to older estimates.1
These findings have massive consequences for the whole story of human origins. They prove that a clever, large-brained type of human was living in East Asia over 1 Mya.6 This challenges the old idea that all the important evolutionary steps only happened in Africa before humans spread out. The new data shows that different human types branched off and developed rapidly across Asia very early on.
2. The Confusing Ice Ages and the Crushed Skull
The time period called the Middle Pleistocene (about 789,000 to 130,000 years ago) is a confusing chapter in human evolution, known for huge changes and human migration.1
2.1. The "Muddle in the Middle"
Scientists often call the fossil record from this time the "Muddle in the Middle" because there are so many confusing fossils that are hard to sort into clear species.1 Fossils found around the world often have a mix of traits from different human types. This has caused debates among scientists who either like to "lump" many fossils into one species or "split" them into many new ones. To solve this, a reliable family tree is needed, which is exactly what the corrected Yunxian 2 skull provides.1
The big problem was that many key fossils were too broken or warped by geological pressure to be properly measured. If you can't see the true shape of the skull, you can only guess its place in evolution. So, scientists often classified these early human types based simply on how old they were, not their actual features.

2.2. The 1990 Discovery
The Yunxian 2 skull was found in 1990 in Hubei province, China.9 It was in extremely bad shape—it was crushed and twisted by the earth's pressure over a million years.10
Because of this damage, and mainly because it was about 1.0 to 1.1 Mya old, it was guessed to be Homo erectus.6 This made sense at the time because
H. erectus was the known older species in Asia. But this initial classification was limited by the damaged state of the fossil. The geological crushing hid any advanced features the skull might have had. The new digital reconstruction, therefore, isn't just fixing a physical shape—it's correcting the historical scientific error caused by the damage.
3. Advanced Digital Methods: Fixing the Skull
The major breakthrough in studying Yunxian 2 came entirely from using advanced computer imaging and reconstruction technology. These tools were essential to overcome the crushing that had hidden the skull's secrets for decades.9
3.1. How They Rebuilt the Skull
To get the skull's original shape, the team used high-tech 3D scanning (CT scans and structure light imaging) and a special virtual rebuilding process.1 This was far better than trying to physically glue pieces back together, which can be inaccurate.
The process involved "digital uncrushing": scientists first digitally separated the crushed pieces, removed mineral material, and mapped all the cracks.13 Then, they used fixed points on the skull and restored symmetry (making the left side match the right) to virtually put the fragments back together, creating a scientifically accurate model of the skull's original form.13 This digital model was the basis for all further comparisons.1
3.2. Testing the Results
To compare the fixed Yunxian 2 skull with others, they used 3D shape comparison (Geometric Morphometric analysis), which is much better than simple length measurements.8 They compared hundreds of points on the reconstructed skull against a reference library of 100 to 170 key human fossils from all over the world.10 This comparison clearly showed that Yunxian 2 grouped closely with other Asian fossils, such as the famous Harbin skull, forming the
Homo longi group.14
The new results were so surprising that the team had to test them repeatedly. Professor Xijun Ni, co-lead of the project, said, "From the very beginning, when we got the result, we thought it was unbelievable. How could that be so deep into the past? But we tested it again and again to test all the models, use all the methods, and we are now confident about the result, and we’re actually very excited".5 The team ran over 10,000 numerical simulations to prove the result was statistically solid, even considering the damage.13
Table 1 shows some of the skull's key features that forced scientists to change its classification.13
Table 1: Technical Comparison of Yunxian 2 (Reconstructed) Features
|
Trait |
Yunxian 2 (Reconstructed) |
Typical Asian Homo erectus |
Match with Later Humans (H. longi) |
Source |
|
Age (Mya) |
Very Early Member |
4 |
||
|
Brain Size (cc) |
(Large for its age) |
Usually |
Similar to early large-brained Homo |
13 |
|
Forehead |
Low, sloping |
Sloping, low top of head |
Moving toward a higher forehead |
13 |
|
Brow Ridge |
Thick/Heavy |
Very big ridge above the eyes |
Kept this older trait |
9 |
|
Facial Structure |
Projecting lower face (old) but Flatter cheekbones (new) |
Projecting forward |
Closer to the flatter faces of H. longi |
13 |
4. The New Family Tree: Introducing Homo longi
The reconstructed Yunxian 2 skull has a "mosaic" anatomy—a mix of old and new features—that makes it a link to more advanced human types.
4.1. The Mix of Old and New
The skull has some "old" features (plesiomorphy) similar to H. erectus, such as a long, low braincase and thick brow ridges.2
But it also has "new" features (apomorphy) that put it in the same group as later, larger-brained humans. Most importantly, its brain size, at about 1143 cc, is much bigger than typical H. erectus for its age.14 This shows that brains were getting bigger in Asian populations much earlier than previously thought. The flatter cheekbones and expanded back of the skull also point to later human groups.13 This mix suggests Yunxian 2 belongs to a population very close to where the
H. longi and H. sapiens lines first separated.2
4.2. H. longi is Our Closest Cousin
The comparison confirmed Yunxian 2 belongs in the Homo longi group (Dragon Man), which includes the Harbin skull and other large-brained Asian fossils.15 Finding this 1-million-year-old skull means we now know the
H. longi line goes back much further in time.
The most comprehensive family tree built by the team shows that the H. longi group is the sister group to the H. sapiens group.1 This means the Asian
H. longi line, which includes Yunxian 2, shares a more recent common ancestor with us (modern humans) than the line that led to Neanderthals.15 This completely reorganizes our understanding of ancient human relationships.
4.3. The Denisovan Connection
A key part of this finding is linking the H. longi group to the mysterious Denisovans.2 Until now, Denisovans were only known through small fragments and their DNA found in Siberia. The scientists argue that the unique features of the
H. longi group (the Dragon Man lineage) are what the Denisovans probably looked like.2
By making this connection, the research successfully links the physical shape of the fossils (like Yunxian 2) to a major known line of archaic humans (Denisovans), supporting the new definition of the H. longi group.19
Table 3: The Homo longi Group and Its Place in the Family Tree
|
Group Member |
Key Fossil/Evidence Location |
Estimated Time |
Relationship to H. sapiens |
Source |
|
Earliest Member |
Yunxian 2 (Hubei, China) |
Mya |
Very close to the point where our lines separated |
19 |
|
Later Member |
Harbin Skull ("Dragon Man," China) |
years ago |
Confirmed part of H. longi |
15 |
|
Genetic Link |
Denisovans (Siberia, etc.) |
Varies (Late Ice Age) |
Likely part of the H. longi Group |
2 |
|
Overall Status |
N/A |
Very ancient roots |
Designated as the Closest Relative (Sister Group) to H. sapiens |
2 |
5. A Much Older Evolutionary Clock
The new analysis using the ancient Yunxian 2 skull changes the timeline of human evolution, showing that our family branches split much further back in time.
5.1. Dating the Splits
To figure out when the major human groups separated, the researchers used a method that uses the specific age of the Yunxian 2 skull (1.0 to 1.1 Mya) as a fixed point on the evolutionary tree.15
The results show a startlingly old branching pattern:
-
The line leading to Neanderthal ancestors split off first, about 1.38 Million Years Ago (Mya).4
-
Next, the split between the line and the (Denisovan) line occurred around 1.32 Mya.4
This means that the genetic and physical differences that mark these major human groups began accumulating over a period hundreds of thousands of years longer than scientists thought.
5.2. Doubling Our Own Line's Age
This new timeline dramatically changes when the H. sapiens line is thought to have begun. Previous estimates placed the split between modern humans and Neanderthals around 500,000 to 800,000 years ago.9 The new figure of 1.32 Mya pushes back the origin of our species’ lineage by about 400,000 to 500,000 years.1
Co-author Prof. Chris Stringer noted that the revised timeline "more or less doubles the time of origin of Homo sapiens".5 This shows that the early, distinct populations that would eventually lead to us were already spread across the globe a million years ago.5
Table 2: New Human Evolution Timeline
|
Splitting Event |
Old Guess (kya) |
New Calculation (Mya) |
Time Shift |
Source |
|
H. sapiens / H. longi (Denisovan) Split |
thousand years ago |
million years ago |
Pushed back thousand years |
4 |
|
H. sapiens / Neanderthal Split |
thousand years ago |
million years ago |
Pushed back thousand years |
9 |
|
Time Large-Brained Humans Existed in Asia (Yunxian 2) |
thousand years ago |
million years ago |
Pushed back thousand years |
5 |
6. What This Means for the Story of Human Evolution
The new placement of the Yunxian 2 skull has huge consequences for how we view human evolution, especially regarding where different human types originated.
6.1. Asia Was Important, Too
For a long time, the main story was that all the important evolutionary changes—like the development of bigger brains—happened mainly in Africa. Then, humans spread out from there.20 The Yunxian 2 findings seriously question this "Africa-centric" model.6
The discovery confirms that a large-brained, advanced human group (H. longi) was already established in East Asia around 1 Mya.5 This means that crucial evolutionary advances, previously thought to only happen later in Africa, were happening independently in Asia at the same time.6 This suggests a much more complicated, branching model where early migrations led to fast, local evolution across the whole Eurasian continent.
6.2. Different Humans Lived Together for Ages
The sheer age of the splits (over 1.3 Mya) shows that many different human species—the lines leading to modern humans, Neanderthals, and H. longi—lived and co-existed for almost a million years.1 These different groups probably interacted, competed, and maybe even interbred (exchanged genes) over that long period.5
6.3. Solving the "Muddle in the Middle"
The strong evidence from Yunxian 2 gives scientists a powerful tool to finally categorize the confusing Middle Pleistocene fossils, solving the "Muddle in the Middle."1
Because the major lines separated over 1.3 Mya, it supports the idea that many of the fossils from that time were already distinct species, not just variations of one simple line leading to us.9 By clearly defining the
H. longi group, the study provides a clearer structure, allowing scientists to sort the baffling array of fossils from 1 million to 300,000 years ago.1
7. What Happens Next
The digital repair and analysis of the Yunxian 2 skull represent a major change in how we understand the human family tree.
7.1. New View of Our Origins
The science now integrates the fact that the 1-million-year-old Yunxian 2 is an early member of the Homo longi (Denisovan) group, and that this group is our closest cousin.2 This moves the separation point between modern humans and our closest extinct relatives back to about 1.32 Mya.4 This means the origins of clever, large-brained human populations happened much earlier and over a larger geographical area than we used to think.6
7.2. The Need for DNA Proof
While the skull's shape strongly suggests the new classification, the final scientific proof must come from genetics. Since fixing the skull involves some interpretation, the ultimate test is whether scientists can extract ancient DNA or proteins from the fossil itself.11
As Dr. Frido Welker noted, molecular data from the specimen "could provide insights confirming or disproving the authors' morphological hypothesis".17 Finding ancient DNA in the warmer climate of Hubei, China, is tough, but the compelling evidence from the skull means researchers will keep trying to find molecular proof from this important Asian fossil.
The repositioning of Yunxian 2 confirms that the story of Homo evolution is complex and branched, with multiple successful human types spreading out across the globe long before Homo sapiens did.
Works cited
-
Analysis of reconstructed ancient skull pushes back our origins by 400,000 years to more than one million years ago | Natural History Museum, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.nhm.ac.uk/press-office/press-releases/analysi...
-
The phylogenetic position of the Yunxian cranium elucidates the origin of Homo longi and the Denisovans - PubMed, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40997177/
-
accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.techexplorist.com/new-skull-discovery-china-s...
-
Scientists Reconstruct a Million-Year-Old Skull and Suggest It Could Rewrite Our Timeline of Human Evolution - Smithsonian Magazine, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/scientists-reco...
-
Chinese one-million-year-old Yunxian 2 skull challenges Homo sapiens timeline, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/science/article-868805
-
Million-year-old skull suggests humans emerged earlier than thought, challenging the Africa-centric theory of evolution, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/science/million-year-...
-
Million-year-old skull found in China could rewrite human evolution timeline, study finds: "This changes a lot of thinking" - CBS News, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ancient-skull-could-rewrite-...
-
The phylogenetic position of the Yunxian cranium elucidates the origin of Homo longi and the Denisovans - bioRxiv, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.16.594603...
-
1 million-year-old Yunxian skull redefines human evolution and Denisovan origin, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://archaeologymag.com/2025/09/yunxian-skull-redefine...
-
Discovery of Million-Year-Old Skull 'Totally Changes' Human Evolution Story - Newsweek, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.newsweek.com/discovery-of-million-year-old-sk...
-
Study of 1m-year-old skull points to earlier origins of modern ..., accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2025/sep/25/study-of-...
-
accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.nhm.ac.uk/press-office/press-releases/analysi...
-
Million-Year-Old Skull Yunxian 2 from China Rewrites Human Evolution Timeline, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://english.cas.cn/newsroom/research_news/life/202509...
-
New look at a million-year-old skull dramatically changes the human timeline and the story of us - Earth.com, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.earth.com/news/million-year-old-yunxian-2-dra...
-
An ancient Chinese skull might change how we see our human roots - Science News, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.sciencenews.org/article/ancient-chinese-skull...
-
Did a million-year-old skull just rewrite our origin story? Researchers say, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.hindustantimes.com/trending/us/did-a-million-...
-
Million-Year-Old Skull Discovery Rewrites Human Evolution Timeline | Ancient Origins, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-evolution-human-orig...
-
The phylogenetic position of the Yunxian cranium elucidates the origin of Homo longi and the Denisovans | Sciety, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://sciety.org/articles/activity/10.1101/2024.05.16.5...
-
The phylogenetic position of the Yunxian cranium elucidates the origin of Homo longi and the Denisovans | bioRxiv, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.05.16.594603v2
-
A new skull discovery in China is shaking up human origins research - Tech Explorist, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.techexplorist.com/new-skull-discovery-china-s...
-
Africa or Asia? Million-year-old human skull found in China challenges human evolution timeline - The Economic Times, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/us/where-d...